BCCI / RESEARCHv2.2 · position-driven · source-bound research
← All assertions
Assertion 10 / fact-10

More than 80 tons of BCCI records were transferred in six planeloads in April 1994.

The federal court’s 1999 opinion describes the Geneva Agreement transfer from Abu Dhabi to the Court-Appointed Fiduciaries: more than 80 tons of BCCI records, including audit-committee, majority-shareholder-investigation and central-administration files, shipped in six planeloads in April 1994.

SUPPORTED

Federal judicial record

Confidence assessment: documentary support, without numerical probability.

Supporting evidence (2)

S9 / reviewed summary

United States v. BCCI Holdings, 69 F. Supp. 2d 36

primary-origin record

1999 opinion; Geneva Agreement / record-transfer discussion; search “80 tons” and “planeloads”

The court identifies the physical record collection, transfer origin and recipient, contents, shipment count and April 1994 timing.

What this establishes: A judicially identified archive, not a speculative records search.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/69/36/2348631/
Source record
Show source → passage → interpretation → assertion
1. Raw source

United States v. BCCI Holdings, 69 F. Supp. 2d 36

Open original document
2. Passage

The court identifies the physical record collection, transfer origin and recipient, contents, shipment count and April 1994 timing.

1999 opinion; Geneva Agreement / record-transfer discussion; search “80 tons” and “planeloads”

reviewed summary; not a verbatim quotation
3. Interpretation

A judicially identified archive, not a speculative records search.

Scope: The quoted or summarized proposition is limited to the entity, period and procedural context identified in this document.

Alternative reading / remaining record

Obtain accession registers, airway bills, packing lists, box inventories and current repository records. Keep this shipment distinct from the later worldwide liquidation collection.

4. Assertion linkagefact-10

primary-origin documentary supportA judicially identified archive, not a speculative records search.

S70 / reviewed summary

DOJ FARA filing, “Document History”

primary-origin record

December 1, 1994 supplemental statement

The filing describes the documentary provenance of reconstructed BCCI / ICIC records, including Naqvi’s files.

What this establishes: A separate provenance record; it does not replace the shipment’s box-level inventory.

https://efile.fara.gov/docs/3911-Supplemental-Statement-19941201-DMTQ7T92.pdf
Source record
Show source → passage → interpretation → assertion
1. Raw source

DOJ FARA filing, “Document History”

Open original document
2. Passage

The filing describes the documentary provenance of reconstructed BCCI / ICIC records, including Naqvi’s files.

December 1, 1994 supplemental statement

reviewed summary; not a verbatim quotation
3. Interpretation

A separate provenance record; it does not replace the shipment’s box-level inventory.

Scope: The quoted or summarized proposition is limited to the entity, period and procedural context identified in this document.

Alternative reading / remaining record

Obtain accession registers, airway bills, packing lists, box inventories and current repository records. Keep this shipment distinct from the later worldwide liquidation collection.

4. Assertion linkagefact-10

primary-origin documentary supportA separate provenance record; it does not replace the shipment’s box-level inventory.

Counter-evidence and qualifications (0)

No contrary item has been curated for this exact claim. This does not mean a comprehensive contrary-evidence search is complete.

Test source-exclusion scenarios

Temporarily exclude documents and inspect whether the remaining record establishes the exact claim.

SUPPORTED

Federal judicial record

Baseline documentary assessment for this exact claim. Evidence type describes the record; it is not a numerical probability.

S9S70

Where this meets litigation

The archive appears in the First American / BCCI litigation record and provides a concrete records-custody target.

What record would resolve the remaining question?

Obtain accession registers, airway bills, packing lists, box inventories and current repository records. Keep this shipment distinct from the later worldwide liquidation collection.

Litigation phase / historical source status

Where the records meet the proceedings

Phases describe the dated documents. Proposed requests and background relationships do not establish an active lawsuit.

BCCI Holdings v. Khalil and related First American discovery

Trial opinion / related discovery rulings (1997–1999)

Recovered archive records and trial exhibits are documented. Full exhibits and later docket history still need collection.

S9S72S73