Loading the research record…
BCCI → bin Laden → Al Shamal uses separate sourced edges. Bank of America litigation and American Express’s 7 WTC operations keep their distinct documentary paths.
American Express Bank → Al Shamal
S60BCCI → Osama bin Laden
S60Osama bin Laden → Al Shamal
S60Osama bin Laden → Al Shamal
A011Senate record; does not turn every charge into a conviction
S48A056Assertion associations are cross-reference aids; verify the specific source chain. No edge is generated merely from co-mentions.
Phases describe the dated documents. Proposed requests and background relationships do not establish an active lawsuit.
Historical outcome, not a current docket check. Settlement terms and full discovery production remain uncollected.
S40S49S51A021A031A059Several opinions are bundled under S6. These sources do not establish the current docket status or storage of litigation files at 7 WTC.
S6S52S53S54Recovered archive records and trial exhibits are documented. Full exhibits and later docket history still need collection.
S9S72S73S44 supplies an administrative notice, despite its register description as a criminal indictment. Read each instrument before assigning a case outcome.
S44S48S66S95S96A056These are distinct proceedings. Allegations in an indictment and appellate discussion are not interchangeable with factual findings.
S108S109S110S112Paragraph 171’s intelligence-file exclusion is preserved. No BCCI-specific access or document-custody connection is established.
S80S83The report expressly excludes an established link between the attacks and BCCI litigation-file destruction. A named lawsuit and docket are needed to assign a litigation phase.
S56S57S58S59S60A026A035A036A025A037A010Do not label proposed requests as pending litigation. Request receipts and decisions would establish later phases.
S119S120S121S131S132S133S1361998 embassy-bombing claims. Linked Document 55 discusses the Al Shamal investment at p.22. This is not the December 22 document named in the report; Exhibit V and later procedural history need collection.
A011Al Shamal dismissed without prejudice for lack of service. Claims against BNPP face pleading deficiencies. This source concerns 1998 embassy bombings, not a September 11 lawsuit.
A014Section III.A records the September 30, 1998 merger. Record date and merger date differ; this is a securities-disclosure proceeding, not BCCI litigation.
A034Regulatory approval, not an active litigation phase. The published order does not resolve complete natural-person ownership.
A012A013Underlying supplied URLs failed to retrieve. Conventional credit-enhancement/control example in the White Paper; no BCCI financing is established.
A047A048Final Board decision after a 1995 administrative hearing. Press release announces $37 million penalty and permanent banking prohibition. Later appeal history was not checked.
A057